The Big Sky is one of the deepest conference top to bottom. Predicting a winner is difficult. Last year was my first attempt to take emotion out of it and use analytics to predict the winner. How I did this was combination of a “True Skill Ranking” and “Strength of Schedule” calculation.
Before we get into this year. It is a fair question to ask, How did last year go? How accurate is this? It is a little difficult to compare as I originally completed predicitons before five Big Sky Schools opted out of Spring. Lets look anyway with removing the teams that did not play and adjusting.
Predicted Finish | Team | Predicted Record | Actual Finish | Team | Actual Record |
1 | Weber State | 6-0 | 1 | Weber State | 5-0 |
2 | E.Washington | 5-1 | 2 | E.Washington | 5-1 |
t3 | UC Davis | 4-2 | t3 | UC Davis | 3-2 |
t3 | N.Arizona | 4-2 | t3 | N.Arizona | 3-2 |
5 | Idaho | 2-4 | t5 | Idaho | 2-4 |
t-6 | Idaho State | 1-5 | t5 | Idaho State | 2-4 |
t-6 | Cal Poly | 1-5 | 7 | S.Utah | 1-5 |
8 | S.Utah | 0-6 | 8 | Cal Poly | 0-3 |
I will let you all determine if this was succesful or not, especially with last springs circumstances. But at least now you know how it did.
This season will be a test as all 13 current Big Sky Football Conference teams are playing. This is also only looking at the conference schedule. The out of conference schedule has not been included. Also the database used to calculate my True Skill rankings are not released yet. These prediciton are stricly of SOS and leave room for updating before conference kickoff.

Before we get into predicitons, lets take a look at some of the oddities of the 2nd annual Strength of Schedule Tub Table.
Obviously this system is not perfect, I am the first to acknowledge this. As Weber State (Preseason pick to win conference) benefits from not playing themselves and vice versa Northern Colorado and Cal Poly are punished for not playing themselves.
That being said it is the second time in as many seasons Weber State has the path of least resistance to win the championship. Montana State and Eastern Washington have a weird scenario too. Eastern Washington has the toughest schedule at home (Montana,Idaho,Weber & Montana State). While Montana State has toughest road schedule (Portland State, Weber State, Eastern Washington & Montana). Then they swap and Eastern has the least difficult road schedule. While Montana State has by far the easiest schedule at home. sidenote, I honestly wonder how season ticket sales are going with no Choate, 18 months of no football and a lackluster home schedule.
If you are looking for this years dark horse, Northern Arizona harbors 3rd easiest schedule and only by 2 points. The Standard Deviation for strength of schedule is 9.4. Being only 2 points off from easiest schedule is a big benefit to the lumberjacks of Flagstaff. To their defense, Shaun Rainey of SWX Montana and Colter Nuanez of Skyline Sports have been high on Portland State, Even saying they are top four in big sky. They do have 5th easiest schedule in the conference and could be one of those annual dark horses the big sky seems to get every year.
Okay enough of me nerding out over schedule strength statistics that really dont mean anything once the ball is kicked off to what you are all here for… using those useless statistics to make analytical predictions for each team in the conference.

t13. Cal Poly 0-8
t13. Northern Colorado 0-8
11. Southern Utah 1-7
t10. Portland State 2-6
t10. Idaho State 2-6
8. Idaho 3-5
t5.Northern Arizona 5-3
t5. Montana State 5-3
t5. UC Davis 5-3
t3. Eastern Washington 7-1
t3. Sac State 7-1
t1. Montana 8-0
t1. Weber State 8-0
Reminder these are not my predictions. You can tune into our live youtube show August 10th around 8 PT with Skyline Sports Colter Nuanez to hear how myself and the rest of the team think conference season will go.
*** As always I”m not an journalist so, take your gramatical error comments, & put them in a beg some-Where. Hope you enjoyed the content regarless if you maid it too dis disclaimer 😉
Leave a Reply